Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing all 1 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICC - Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta

    Year
    2015
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Sexual Violence against Men Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution Evidentiary Rules Regarding Sexual Violence Prosecutions
    Country
    Kenya
    Keywords
    Acts of a Sexual Nature Genitalia Withdrawal of Charges Penile Amputation

    Reference link
    https://www.icc-cpi.int/kenya/kenyatta
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Court
    Name of accused
    Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
    Charges
    Kenyatta was charged, in the context of the 2007-2008 post-election violence in Kenya, with: - Rape and other forms of sexual violence as crimes against humanity under Article 25(3)(a) or (d) (“From on or about 27 December 2007 to 29 February 2008, Muthaura, Kenyatta and Ali, as co-perpetrators, or in the alternative, as part of a group of persons acting with a common purpose, committed or contributed to the commission of crimes against humanity, namely rape and other forms of sexual violence against civilian supporters of the Orange Democratic Movement political party in or around locations including Kibera (Kibera Division, Nairobi Province), Nakuru town (Nakuru District, Rift Valley Province) and Naivasha town (Naivasha District, Rift Valley Province), Republic of Kenya, in violation of Articles 7(l)(g) and 25(3)(a) or (d) of the Rome Statute.”).
    Trial chamber verdict
    In the Decision on the Confirmation of the Charges of 23 January 2012, the Chamber decided to remain the charge of rape as a crime against humanity, but to replace the charge of other forms of sexual violence as crimes against humanity (Article 7(1)(g) with causing severe/serious physical injuries which constitutes other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity (Article 7(1)(k)). (“Turning to the legal characterization of these acts, the Chamber recalls that it is essential for qualification of a certain act as other forms of sexual violence pursuant to article 7(l)(g) of the Statute that the act in question be of a sexual nature. The Chamber notes that at the confirmation of charges hearing, the Prosecutor submitted ‘that these weren’t just attacks on men’s sexual organs as such but were intended as attacks on men’s identities as men within their society and were designed to destroy their masculinity’. The Chamber is of the view that not every act of violence which targets parts of the body commonly associated with sexuality should be considered an act of sexual violence. In this respect, the Chamber considers that the determination of whether an act is of a sexual nature is inherently a question of fact. The Chamber finds that the evidence placed before it does not establish the sexual nature of the acts of forcible circumcision and penile amputation visited upon Luo men. Instead, it appears from the evidence that the acts were motivated by ethnic prejudice and intended to demonstrate cultural superiority of one tribe over the other. Therefore, the Chamber concludes that the acts under consideration do not qualify as other forms of sexual violence within the meaning of article 7(l)(g) of the Statute. However, as explained in the following section, the Chamber considers them as part of the Prosecutor’s allegation of acts causing severe physical injuries and will address them accordingly.” (paras. 264-266)) On 5 December 2014, the Prosecutor filed a notice to withdraw charges against Kenyatta (due to the status of the evidence available). On 13 March 2015, Trial Chamber V(B), noting the Prosecution’s withdrawal of charges against Kenyatta, decided to terminate the proceedings in this case and to vacate the summons to appear against him. The Prosecution held that the case can be re-opened, or brought in a different form, if new evidence establishing the crimes and his responsibility for them is discovered. Trial terminated.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICC-01/09-02/11

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).